jupyter

DOCKER HUB ↗ FREE 0 PRODUCTS·60D

Registry namespace jupyter · ranked #— of publishers. Quality = (3·A + B − 0.5·F) ÷ products_60d = — over 0 product(s) pushed in the last 60 days. × breadth 0.00 (= ln(1 + 0)) → v2 rank —.

PROJECTS

PROJECTS GRADED

0 / 1

FRESH ≤90D

0 / 1

AVG SCORE

—

VARIANTS

0 / 1

what each count means →

Products

1 products · 1 releases tracked in last 365d · best-graded release shown per product

Jupyter · jupyter

jupyter/base-notebook

BEST

—

365D RELEASES

1·

OPEN CVES

—

best release · C / H / M

PULLS

—

repo-level

Pull →

How grades on this page work

Each image is scored 0–100 by the cerodeo-v2 Rodeo rubric. Grade bands: A ≥ 85 B ≥ 70 C ≥ 55 D ≥ 40 F < 40.

An image starts at 100 and loses points for open CVEs: −25 per fixable Critical, −10 fixable High, −3 fixable Medium, −8 unfixable Critical, −3 unfixable High. It earns points back for hygiene: non-root default (+10), rebuilt in last 90 days (+10), cosign signature (+5), SLSA provenance (+5), SHA256 pinned (+5), SBOM attestation (+3), HEALTHCHECK (+3), OCI labels (+3), multi-arch (+2–3), upstream GH release (+3), README example (+2).

A-grade means score ≥ 85. Working backward from the formula: an image earns A when it has zero fixable Critical CVEs (one is a −25 hit, drops you out of A no matter the hygiene) and at most one fixable High CVE (−10 brings you to 90, still A). Fixable Mediums at −3 and unfixable Highs at −3 are cheap; you can carry a handful before dropping to B. Hygiene bonuses buffer against the smaller CVE penalties — non-root default (+10) alone covers two unfixable Criticals. A publisher with many A grades is one that consistently hits that math: not just avoiding CVEs by accident, but shipping with signed provenance, non-root defaults, and timely rebuilds. The AVG SCORE above is the average 0–100 Rodeo score across the 0 scanned images in this namespace.

Full rubric with every weight at /about/grades. Changes to any weight ship as a new rubric_version so old snapshots stay auditable.

What people say about jupyter

Mark as review

No comments yet. Be the first.